With all the insanity going on in the world. Illogic and chaos ruling the day. Getting ready to turn another chapter in life's journey.... a nice hot cup of cappuccino seems just right.
(Instax Wide Evo - Normal+Vignette)
(Instax Wide Evo - Normal+Vignette)
So in the world of Fujifilm Instax you have three sizes - Wide, Square and Mini
Factoid.... Fujifilm makes the most money on INSTAX film. Specifically, the Mini format.
Reason for that is that Mini generally sells for about $0.90 a shot
Square sells for about the same at $0.90 to $1.00 a shot.
Wide - being the largest format sells for about $1.70-$1.90 a shot.
WELL THROW ALL THAT OUT THE WINDOW.
It is obvious that the USA supply for Instax has been replenished.
Thanks to "Orange Face", "TACO" or whatever name you have for him...
Instax Square went from an average of $0.90 a shot to $1.20 (25% increase)
Instax Mini went from an average of $0.90 to now a whopping $1.38 a shot (40% increase)
Why the Mini format went up so much? Can only speculate that being the most popular and supply must have been fully exhausted, the price reflects the full tariff in effect.
The Square format most likely still have some inventory in the USA left and Fuji is adjusting the price now so that when the supply is exhausted, the sticker shock won't be as bad at 1st. It will probably sell at the same price as the Mini format.
BIG SURPRISE HERE - INSTAX WIDE WENT DOWN !!!
Film has an expiration date and Fujifilm Instax Wide has not been as popular. Existing inventory must still be large and starting to age - thus the discounted price.
Also the new Instax Evo Wide camera has been just a moderate success.
Chances are that when the film supply of Instax Wide is replenished, the price will be over $2 a shot.
Which is close to what the Polaroid film is currently selling for.
BTW - Polaroid B&W film has gone up as well from about $1.80 a shot to now $1.95 (8% increase)
The current batch of Polaroid color film is at least somewhat stable in terms of what you get and the colors. Still NO leave it and watch it develop before your eyes, TOO sensitive to temperature, INCONSISTENT with the results.
However, there is one film stock from Polaroid that I feel is more than acceptable is by far way better than Fujifilm Instax Monochrome.
It is the Polaroid Black and White film.
Images start to appear after about 15 seconds and the quality of the photo is really good. Dynamic range is acceptable.
I can't wait for Polaroid to come out with an improved Color and Black and White film.
For my photo peeps.... keep buying the film and keep them alive !!!!
The top photo using the Wide Evo with a good dose of vignetting.
The bottom photo using the RF.
Used the vignette feature on the Wide Evo because the Fuji hybrid will make everything in focus so the intent of the vignette is to do some sort of subject isolation.
The Mint RF70 used f16 at 1/500s.
Although f/16, keep in mind that it is shooting on a very wide surface so essentially f/16 is more like f4 on 35mm.
I like the fact that I can isolate the subject better with the RF (there is some control over depth of field).
Still loving the instant stuff. There's challenge and forces me to think that a digital camera just doesn't replicate as well. Bluntly the film is limited and the challenge to get what I want is something I have to work at - love it, lotta fun!!!
The meter used on the RF is one of those Keks mini meters (thanks FIRESIDE CAMERA for having the meter in stock).
The SX70 or in this case the reworked and refurbished Mint SLR670 i-Type Ming Edition (whew) still is king. The i2 that Polaroid makes is great for the ability to use LIDAR to focus and is fully manual when you want it, the feel of the SX70 and being an SLR and can focus down to 7" is still amazing.
The one thing that photographers will generally agree upon is the JOY we get when a photograph we took brings a reaction to someone. For those who understand the power of Polaroid (or any Instant Print), is the ability to give something to someone right away and to see them now with the JOY. It's a gift... it's sharing a moment captured on film.
I was skeptical about the hybrid instant camera in that some will argue it's not a pure instant print since the image was captured digitally and then printed.
However, I decided to keep the essence of what is an Instant print, by printing out the image right there and then.
The ability to make copies may hurt the purity of the image but tonight I was able to take some images of my stepson's birthday along with an early celebration of my wife's birthday and hand them to the family.
Each one loved it and shared it and stared at it.
My step Granddaughter was fascinated by the white piece of plastic telling mom and dad..."white...white" but the look on her face as the image appeared - priceless.
In a world of high quality digital images and cellphone cameras that are really outstanding, this pseudo analog, physical thing still touches people.
Many rejoiced that Polaroid Integral Instant Film is saved. Unfortunately, the plant was already partially dismantled, and the chemicals were gone. So, they started from scratch.
A bunch of people who worked at the plant and at Polaroid HQ in Massachusetts came together to try to bring it all back.
The initial product was, and this is being nice, total crap!
The company went from IMPOSSIBLE to POLAROID ORIGINALS and now POLAROID.
They went from above to at least something better and more stable.
One of my colleagues has a collection of unique bags that she brings. I make it a point to take an instant print of the bags when I see it in our breakroom at work. I then leave the photo on top for her to have.
The wonderful thing about Instant Photos is the joy on the person's face when you and them or give them a photo.
Granted I can take a cellphone shot that will probably look a lot better or take out my serious digital stuff and turn the photo into a wall worthy shot.... but beyond the "oh it's nice" reaction you get with most photos, the Instant Print has always resulted in a reaction of.... "you gave me this photo." It's an inexpensive gift to give.
I'm hooked.
Dr.Land fought back and wanted nothing of the sort... the picture taking process was to eliminate as much "photography gear" stuff as possible. He wanted the human to be able to capture the moment and not focus on making it work.
At the end, the SX70 has a small split focus dot towards the bottom of the screen. This was a stop gap before the sonar autofocus would be out.
So what does this SX70 tid bit have to do with this Instax Wide Evo?
This camera is amazing. Granted it's another hybrid from Fuji, but they did so much to put the analog feeling and process into the camera. This camera looks like a miniature View Camera. In fact it sort of acts like one with you looking at a glass LCD screen to compose. There's little else beyond the 100 different effects you can select - but Fuji makes you decide on it before you take the photo. Very little digital editing here please.
In just three days, I've created images that either would be extremely difficult or impossible to produce on an analog instant camera.
This leads to the conundrum. Analog with a lot of human intervention is one thought with photographers. The idea is to create an image and NOT just take a picture. Yet this hybrid camera has the ability to capture moments in time right away with little fuss and a lot of capabilities.
My goal is to immediately print an image if I feel it's important, special or a need to have this film artifact made is starting to make me rethink it all.
Thinking back to the Polaroids of my youth, there wasn't much but to rudely focus the lens and shoot. Yet those images today hold such a value that a film camera and now digital camera cannot reproduce.
After spending tens of thousands of dollars over the years to capture a feeling, a moment (Capturing Light and Life is my tag line after all) did this camera finally won me over?
One thing is for sure, all this Instant Photography has me wanting to shoot photos again.
More to come...
Question or Debate over this Fujifilm Instax Mini Evo stems from the fact that this is a hybrid instant camera. Hybrid meaning that it shoot not directly on film but on a sensor. The film portion is a printer where the image is transferred to instant film
Some, and including me in the past, called this cheating. Missing the true essence of an Instant print. The precious 1:1 original shot there and then.
Fuji did do what they could to make it as analog as possible in that you have to make all your adjustments in terms of film effects and lens effects before pressing the shutter. You cannot make changes after the photo is done with the exception of altering the brightness of the image and a bit of zoom.
So the die hards will still say it's not really an instant print.
I thought it over for a bit. Dr.Land wanted to remove all distractions between you and the image. The Polaroid (Instant photography) is a physical artifact of the moment the photo was taken. This is indeed the major reason why Polaroids or Fujiroids are so special.
So to stay true to the art, I make it a point that if the image has some special significance or need to have it forever locked to the time and place - I PRINT right away. That image is now my artifact and that years from now when I pick up that print, I will have this attached forever to the time I took the image.
So why not just shoot pure analog versus using this camera?
A few reasons.
It's a crappy digital camera - crappy in that any cellphone will out gun this.
The digitalness allows me to pick and choose between color and black and white. Impossible unless I carry two cameras - 1 with color and the other with black and white.
I can get closer and snap a photo faster with this Evo. Even if I leave the Polaroid, Mint or Fuji on it's automatic mode.
I can shoot in poor lighting without the need of a flash - most of the time.
I can also do that horrible thing and print copies to hand out.
The fun of instant photograph is sharing the image. This is something that is hard to achieve with any other medium. Sharing the image that is PHYSICAL and not another digital image.
So for right now.... this Fujifilm Instax Mini EVO works.
Tomorrow my new Fujifilm Instax Wide EVO arrives.... can't wait !!!!
The dilemma of which camera to take was a struggle. The decision today was to shoot the Mint SLR670 (SX70) and the Polaroid i2.
The use of the SX70 is far superior to the i2. With the SX70, unfolding the camera, the way you need to hold the camera and the focus that makes what you see come to sharpness was totally fun. That plus the classic..... click, click, ka-thump, whirl whirl and snap sounds.
Just using the camera had bystanders smiling. So super cool factor goes to the SX70
The i2 just looks so much like the One Step's and just looking through the viewfinder just doesn't have the same thrill.
However, behold the photo above - taken with the i2 with that deep Polaroid blues. The scan doesn't do justice to the actual print.... but it is wonderful and fun.
Now if only Polaroid (keep in mind Impossible and not the Polaroid of yesterday) can get the film to develop without having to shield it from light right away.
I found having to quickly get the film and place it somewhere while not bending or smushing the chemical pods was something of a pain that I don't have with Fujifilm.
Walking around, looking everywhere, I remember how much fun this actually is.
More to come...
The ability to capture a moment in time of everyday stuff.
Nothing staged. Nothing planned.
Forced to think on your feet
For a few years, this was lost and painful (my friends know why).
Slowly the spark is coming alive.
Slowly I am getting a handle on the camera(s) and the film stock(s).
I am finding my vibe with the Polaroid film combined with the Mint SLR670 iType Ming Edition (aka SX70).
Really hard to love the Polaroid i2 but trying to get it to give me something of consistency is becoming IMPOSSIBLE (pun intended).
Thinking how to use the Polaroids for street photography is going to be a challenge. Instead of being discreate, the sounds from the cameras will blow it. The Mint TL and RF cameras have an advantage where the film does not eject until you are ready. That's going to be a big plus since I can take a shot and not be noticed with the sounds of the camera.
The image above was scanned with the Polaroid app which does an ok job but doesn't do the photo justice. This shot of the cat house in the backyard is far better than what you see here.
The journey continues...
Instant film is a challenge. Without going into great detail, dynamic range (the ability of the film to distinguish light and shadow) is really limited. You need to think if you want some work to come out the way you want. Details and colors are also a challenge. Plus the camera I am using to do the serious instant stuff costs between $500-$1200 each (and there's 4 of them).
You want beautiful, technically perfect stuff, shoot something with a sensor or your cellphone. But enough of this for now, we are talking costs here.
Sticker shock - a pack of Polaroid film with 8 shots runs about $18 or about $2.25 a shot. So each time you press the shutter button, you just spent $2.25.
Fujifilm is cheaper with the Mini film running about $0.75 a shot, Square film about $1 and Wide film about $1.15 a shot.
The normal reaction - "Damn... that's expensive"
So I broke the costs down for a roll of 36 Color Print film.
Consumer grade stuff like Kodak Gold.
1 Roll of film = $10 (costs have gone way up) = $0.28
1 - Process the negative = $12 = $0.33
1 - 4x6 Print = $0.21
For a 4x6 print = $ 0.82 per photo.
Now we need to tack on going to the photolab and back
Runzheimer estimate about $0.45 per mile (we will assume a lab within 10 miles) = $4.50 = $0.13
So the cost of 1 - 4x6 print = $0.95 a shot.
So 35mm film is cheaper = YES but.... and it's a BIG BUT.....
You have to wait for your results.
The look on a person's face with an instant print is priceless
and the big thing.... it's a 1:1 original.
Factor all that in and it's really not that expensive.
"Cheaper than Crack" a photo buddy once told me.
There is just something about using this 50 year old design of a camera that still turn heads and no one has been able to replicate.
The opening of the camera and even the look of the camera is something of a wonder even today. The ability to focus to 7" and with the Mint Time Machine - help tell the camera what you want.
Loving it.
Here's my thoughts....
So there's a debate among Instant Photography folks about the hybrid cameras from Fujifilm.
Some feel that it's not genuine because the image is captured digitally and then printed onto instant film just like the Instax Link printers.
Because the image isn't captured onto film straight from the lens, it's no longer an instant shot.
The advantage of the hybrid is that you can apply effects and do things that our loved analog instant cameras either have a really hard time or can't do. The hybrid (EVO's) can get really close. About 4" away. The i2 can get only 27" close to a subject and you have to fight the parallax issue with the viewfinder to compose the shot.
The SX70 natively can get about 7" away and with the close up filter about 4" - damn.
With my TLR - Mint TL70+ with close up filter - about 7"
The Rangefinder - Mint RF70 - only 3'
Advantage EVO.
THE INSTANT THANG...
Among photographers these phrases, "the best camera is the one on you", "get close", "f8 and be there" and what Dr. Edwin Land said decades ago.... "it will be become part of the human being, press the button and have the picture"
At present, I work with a bunch of great people from all walks of life. So while I was in our breakroom, one of my peers loves unique bags. So she had this one on the table...
Ordered the new Instax Evo Wide today from the gang at FIRESIDE CAMERA in San Francisco.
The camera above is the junior version of the new Instax Evo Wide. The Mini Evo.
Both Evo cameras are out of stock everywhere.... so I did the old "camera quest" and believe it or not, WalMart had two in stock.
Granted this is a pure point and shoot. A hybrid because it is a digital camera with an Instax printer built in. The plus.... see before you print, apply electronic do dads and effects.
It's sorta analog in that the image is on Instant Film. One thing, I am having a blast just snapping away!
Here's where I am at on the quest.
The Mint designed and manufactured cameras have been great.
However, because the wide is a rangefinder style, my minimum focal distance is about 3'. Ok for some stuff but the power of the image sometimes requires you to get close. This reminds me of all the Leica rangefinders I use to shoot. Love a majority of it but not being able to get close is a pain.
The TLR gives me that style of photography which is in itself a lot of fun. I can get really close but only after clipping on a macro lens. Almost like the Rangefinder, the parallax issue is there.
The original Polaroid SLR690 (which will need some repair thanks to me dropping it and knocking the mirrors out of adjustments) still works and that sonar autofocus is still unbelievable and so damn accurate. But not being able to focus does have it's drawbacks.
The i2. I really want to love this camera but it's a viewfinder/rangefinder sort of affair and mastering the parallax is difficult. Also this camera needs a lot of light in order to produce a good image. Even with the flash on, it's been a challenge.
The winner is Dr.Land's SX70. This one is the modified Mint version called the SLR670. The time machine attachment adds to the fun of using it, however with a flash (like the image above), I have to allow the SX70 to do it's thing.
Being an SLR, I can accurately see what I am going to get in terms of framing and depth of field. It comes down to the "using of the camera", the SX70 can get within 7" without any attachments and super close with the close up lens (which I bought years ago when an SX70 accessories kit in mint condition became available).So the 50 year old design that is still super cool and still in some ways ahead of it's time is still the best tool so far.
and the quest continues....
The journey continues. Since I am homebound due to not being able to talk (damn cold), I decided to venture to my backyard again and do some of that photo learning stuff.
The images on the left were taken with the Mint RF70 and using the built in meter to tell me what settings to select.
The images on the right were taken with the Fujifilm X100V transferred to Lightroom and then exported to Gmail and then printed on the Fujifilm Instax Wide printer. This is to keep to the theme of using Instant Film
Keep in mind these photos are only minutes old and will improve over the next few hours.
I expected the X100V images to be overall far better since it's a digital camera.
What I didn't expect were the clarity of the Mint images. Granted exposure and time the photos were taken varied widely but I was impressed with what the Mint was able to produce.
And so the learning curve continues on....
So for those new to this.... proper exposure requires knowing, film speed (ISO) & lens opening (aperture or f stop) & shutter time (seconds).
A light meter will let you know typically a missing variable such as what shutter speed or lens aperture.
All the instant cameras that I have has some sort of built in light meter. However light meters are not perfect in Instant Cameras. They don't have a sensor (unlike a digital camera) and thus metering happens with some sort of reflective meter attached somewhere on the exterior.
Learning this photography thing again reminded me that this is FILM and not DIGITAL and you expose for the shadows and not the highlights unlike digital (or slide film) where it's the opposite.
I went back to old school and the king of metering is still the spot meter (item on the right). It's cool because I had to use the old zone system of metering (for another day). Fun because I had to think about the results I got and apply it towards getting the exposure I wanted. IT WORKED!!!
However walking around with a spot meter sometimes will make you look like a director or pro photographer wanna be and I wanted something small.
The item on the left is a digital mini meter made by Keks. It's ok but because of it's design, it's easily fooled in terms of what to expose for. Bright day with a subject in the shadows - the shadow item will be too dark.
The old school meter by Sekonic has a bit of the same flaw as Keks. I stopped using it because it was metering about 2-3 stops TOO bright. Thanks to the power of YouTube, I found someone who had a home DIY calibration of this meter. Without a lot of detail here, it worked. Verified with 3 digital cameras (Leica, Fuji and Nikon), I took it out and it works well.
This journey is still full of fun and adventure once again. There is just more enjoyment and joy with analog.
My former (and I do say former) Leica collection of M, Q and SL models were even more massive at one time.
The TOP 5
of the Instant Collection
The favorite is....
The runner up...
Mint TL70+
(Twin Lens, Instax Square, Fully Manual)
Followed by...
The Polaroid SLR 690
(Considered by some as the holy grail of SX-70's)
Mint RF70
(The best Instax Wide Camera, Fully Manual)
It has the limitations of a Rangefinder Camera of a close focus of 2.5-3.5 ft
Polaroid i2
(Modern Version of the OneStep with full manual or automatic controls)
Capable, modern, new but something about it missing a "soul" that the SX-70 has.
and for the one left behind....
The camera that caused the monumental lawsuit that took years and essentially damaged both companies.
This was Kodak's middle finger response to Polaroid saying they could care less about those patents.
The one thing about the Kodak is that they did develop the wide format film and with a satin finish versus the glossy finish of Polaroid.
Too bad they couldn't have co-existed.
The outcome would have been so different.
That said, film has an expiration date. Typically, you can get by if it's not too expired.
Instant film - especially Polaroid is really expensive. The great deal on Amazon generally means the film has already passed its expiration date.
So, a word to the wise, unless duly noted on the expiration date, buyer beware.
I think I'm good with the film expiring only a few months ago. The old rule is that a year is perhaps still ok depending on how you store it.